Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Food for Thought
On Liberty and Freedom of Expression
I listened to a radio broadcast on the Internet the other
day and heard Mr. Kem Sokha, Vice President of the CNRP
Party complained bitterly about people who criticised the
CNRP's leadership for NOT doing the right thing (whatever
that right thing might be). Mr. Kem Sokha said that people
who proclaim themselves to be democrats or supporting
democratic movement should not criticise the CNRP's
leadership for whatever reasons because doing so will help
strenghten the position of the CPP.
As a Cambodian, I would like to share a humble opinion on
this issue that it is imperative for people to be able to
express their opinion freely, even though such opinion
might be detrimental to their own interests. Remember
that the struggle between the CNRP and CPP is to bring
better liberty and freedom of expression to Cambodia.
Democracy without freedom of expression is no difference
from dictatoship.
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Food for Thought
Poor Cambodia
When my father was still alive, I used to hear him lamented about dictatorship and oppressive rulers in Cambodia. Whenever he touched on Cambodian politics in his talks, either with his friends or his family members, he always wished to see Cambodian rulers stopped following dictatorial leadership style and followed the principles of liberal democracy. Now, my father had already died. And he died without realizing his dream of seeing Cambodia free from the grip of dictatorial leaders. Based on what I have observed, my father was not the only Cambodian who had a lifelong's wish to see Cambodia becoming a country free from oppressive, dictatorial rulers. Countless Cambodians from one generation to another had or have the same desire. Many of them spent most of their lives fighting for this illusive freedom while others resign to their fate. It has been half a century now since I was born and Cambodia remains politically the same as it was in my father's time. One of the questions I have often asked myself is: Will Cambodia be freed from dictatorial rulers within my lifetime? Though anything is possible, it feels like an oxymoron to think that Cambodia could some day be freed from dictatorial rulers. One reason for this pessimistic thought is that whenever I look back into the behavior of Cambodian leaders in the past including the one who is currently ruling Cambodia, I see them all behave like the animal characters portrayed in George Orwell's book, Animal Farm. All Cambodian leaders, from the past to present, fought so hard to rid Cambodia of dictatorial leaders. However, as soon as they succeeded and became leaders, they behave exactly like the one they replaced. That is to say, they themselves become dictators. The problem with dictatorship is not that we could not get rid of it. It is rather that Cambodian people keep missing the opportunity to get rid of it. For instance, after the UN sponsored election in 1993, the people who are tasked with writing a new constitution could have put term limit on the prime minister. But, they didn't. They could also have put provision to have governors elected by the people rather than appointed by the central government. They didn't. There are many other things such as conflict of interest, transparency, and administrative organization laws that they could have enacted to ensure that the ability for a dictator to shrive within government leadership is weak. But no one seemed to bother doing anything. For example, there is no law on the number of deputy prime ministers. While most countries has only one deputy prime minister or vice president, Cambodia has more then 10 deputy prime ministers. By having so many deputy prime ministers, the prime minister is assured that there is no one to succeed or challenge him. Thus, the dictator will have free reign to abuse his power anyway he pleases. And the poor and powerless Cambodian people will continue to live in deprivation of freedom.
When my father was still alive, I used to hear him lamented about dictatorship and oppressive rulers in Cambodia. Whenever he touched on Cambodian politics in his talks, either with his friends or his family members, he always wished to see Cambodian rulers stopped following dictatorial leadership style and followed the principles of liberal democracy. Now, my father had already died. And he died without realizing his dream of seeing Cambodia free from the grip of dictatorial leaders. Based on what I have observed, my father was not the only Cambodian who had a lifelong's wish to see Cambodia becoming a country free from oppressive, dictatorial rulers. Countless Cambodians from one generation to another had or have the same desire. Many of them spent most of their lives fighting for this illusive freedom while others resign to their fate. It has been half a century now since I was born and Cambodia remains politically the same as it was in my father's time. One of the questions I have often asked myself is: Will Cambodia be freed from dictatorial rulers within my lifetime? Though anything is possible, it feels like an oxymoron to think that Cambodia could some day be freed from dictatorial rulers. One reason for this pessimistic thought is that whenever I look back into the behavior of Cambodian leaders in the past including the one who is currently ruling Cambodia, I see them all behave like the animal characters portrayed in George Orwell's book, Animal Farm. All Cambodian leaders, from the past to present, fought so hard to rid Cambodia of dictatorial leaders. However, as soon as they succeeded and became leaders, they behave exactly like the one they replaced. That is to say, they themselves become dictators. The problem with dictatorship is not that we could not get rid of it. It is rather that Cambodian people keep missing the opportunity to get rid of it. For instance, after the UN sponsored election in 1993, the people who are tasked with writing a new constitution could have put term limit on the prime minister. But, they didn't. They could also have put provision to have governors elected by the people rather than appointed by the central government. They didn't. There are many other things such as conflict of interest, transparency, and administrative organization laws that they could have enacted to ensure that the ability for a dictator to shrive within government leadership is weak. But no one seemed to bother doing anything. For example, there is no law on the number of deputy prime ministers. While most countries has only one deputy prime minister or vice president, Cambodia has more then 10 deputy prime ministers. By having so many deputy prime ministers, the prime minister is assured that there is no one to succeed or challenge him. Thus, the dictator will have free reign to abuse his power anyway he pleases. And the poor and powerless Cambodian people will continue to live in deprivation of freedom.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
ចំណីខួរក្បាល
គ្រាប់សណ្តែក មិនដែល អ្នកដែលសិក្សាវិស័យវេជ្ជសាស្ត្រ ប្រហែលជាធ្លាប់ឮឈ្មោះលោក ហ្គ្រេកហ្គ័រ មិនដែល (Gregor Mendel, 1822-1884) ។ គាត់គឺជាបិតានៃ...
-
រឿង តោនិងក្របីព្រៃ តោមួយបានដើរស្វែងរកអាហារ នៅក្បែរមាត់ព្រៃ ។ នៅពេលវាដើរ មកដល់ក្បែរមាត់បឹងមួយ វាបានឃើញក្របីព្រៃឈ្មោលចំនួនបួន កំពុង ឈរស៊ីស...
-
រឿង ក្មេងប្រុសនិងសត្វកង្កែប មានក្មេងប្រុសមួយក្រុម បាននាំគ្នាទៅរត់លេង នៅក្បែរមាត់ត្រពាំងមួយ ដែលមានសត្វកង្កែបជាច្រើនរស់នៅ ។ បន្ទាប់ពីពួកគេរត...
-
ឱកាសនៅក្នុងឧបស័គ្គ (Opportunity inside Obstacle) នៅក្នុងរង្វង់ជនអន្តោប្រវេសដែលទៅរស់នៅក្នុងប្រទេសថ្មី មានពាក្យមួយឃ្លាដែលគេតែងពោលថា៖ ជនអន្តោ...